what I really want out of this is a microblogging platform that:
1. supports encrypted messaging (including to groups) out of the box.
2. supports a robust mechanism for decentralized groups good admin tooling. This is different from mastodon's instance-oriented communities and timelines. Basically, instances going down would generally "not matter", same as in Matrix.
3. can still participate in fediverse stuff
And this all seems cool but also too much work and idk if anyone would even care to use it.
@zkat They *do* say if you want something done the "right" way, do it yourself. However, this does seem like a lot. What need/want would that meet that isn't currently being met (other than the encrypted messaging bit)?
@zkat Hmm, my misunderstanding. What about things being instanced and "going away" if the admin decides to pick up the ball and go home is worrisome to you?
1. That's too much responsibility and pressure on admins.
2. It strongly favors large, potentially well-funded instances, because people who care about longevity of their content must choose the most trustworthy ones Or Else.
3. This literally happens. It's happened to me. It's not great.
1. True. At the same time, I believe that there are robust tools available to help offset server costs, such as patreons and kofis and just plain monthly PayPal donations. Also, I think that the number of folks who are excellent at volunteer community moderation is larger than it used to be.
2. There are also smaller instances that can be well-supported if the community is tight-knit enough and the admin doesn't do too much advertising.
3. I'm sorry that it happened to you. 1/
@zkat If you ever do decide to do it, especially the "encryption from the start" thing, then that would be pretty amazing. 2/2
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!